12/21/2023 0 Comments Thought bubble costume![]() It's using the visual language of word balloons but isn't representational in the same way. Well, similarly, thoughts don't emanate out of a person's head. And we don't expect words to emanate from a foot. Because on some level we view the word balloon as not just a transcription of sounds but as an actual symbolic representation of those physical sounds. Might the two trends have a common cause?Ī thought balloon can feel awkward for the same reason a word balloon pointing to a person's foot instead of their head would feel awkward. Isn't there a clear parallel in how in prose fiction, third-person omniscient has fallen out of favor, replaced by third-person limited? TPO are like thought balloons, while TPL is like narration boxes. "The thought balloon, regardless of shape or style, just by virtue of its pointer, brings a third party into the relationship: the author, gently putting his/her hand on our shoulder and pointing to the face of the thinker with the words “he thought.” Maybe thoughts are just too private for that kind of parental intrusion."Įach time this sort of thing gets brought up, it's interesting that two points that seem fairly obvious to my mind don't get brought up. We literally bring each sentiment into existence as a thought, creating an instant bond with the character. "The important difference for me is that a thought caption-with or without borders-embodies each thought in a way that encourages us to assume ownership of it as we read. Scott McCloud wrote an interesting piece on that. I feel like the use of text boxes for internal thoughts is more like movie voiceover than literary internal dialogue, which is one of things I enjoy most about reading a novel- the ability to climb into somebody else's head and see the world through their eyes which, when done well, is what thought balloons also allowed for. Very few movies manage to handle internal dialogue well, and those that do use it sparingly. But because they are a static, silent medium, they also benefit from the use of the written word in a way film can't. You often have Spider-man, for instance, narrating, but rarely do we get an entire issue or more from his visual perspective. We have been trained to expect prose in the past tense have you ever read a novel written in present (or future) tense? It's weird.Īnd, if it's first-person narration, then yes, i do, if to a lesser extent because of the aforementioned conventions.īut comics are, almost exclusively, a third-person narrative medium due to their visual component.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |